Barnes and Noble Sheep No More the Art of Awareness and Attack Survival
Meet a Problem?
Thanks for telling us about the problem.
Friend Reviews
Community Reviews
Long entertaining version:
Jonathan Gilliam's Sheep No More aims to be the "safety bible" that "links the leading adept on personal prophylactic with civilians." That appetite is only partly realized. While Gilliam'south volume is a welcom
Brusk Version: There is valuable advice in this book, but yous have to dig for it. Many of the things that Gilliam calls "instance studies" are anecdotes at all-time, and the editor at his publishing house was careless about enforcing agreement in number between subjects and verbs.Long entertaining version:
Jonathan Gilliam'southward Sheep No More aims to exist the "safety bible" that "links the leading expert on personal safety with civilians." That ambition is only partly realized. While Gilliam'south book is a welcome addition to preparedness literature, its jargon-laden style and sloppy editing keep it from becoming the stellar resource that Gilliam hoped for. That failure lies more with the publisher than with the author himself, because the elves at Mail service Hill Printing should have done a better job of pushing Gilliam by rookie mistakes in grammer and presentation.
It does non rob Sheep No More than of its thunder to say that Gilliam's communication boils downward to cultivating heightened awareness of your surroundings and learning to switch apace between "attacker" and "defender" mindsets. You lot tin can exercise those things without martial arts preparation or a concealed-carry permit, but if you are not fluent in the jargon of security-speak, you might wonder why subheadings like "Populating the Target Equation" and "Vehicle Surveillance (Close)" were not flagged for rewrite. My estimate is that Gilliam'south feel intimidated the people working with his manuscript, else somebody would have pointed out that "populating the target equation" is much clearer when rephrased every bit "evaluating your own weaknesses."
Similar other special forces operators who'd rather exist doing something than explaining it to supervisors afterward, Gilliam'due south long career on the pointy finish of public service imbues his writing with a gelled attending to the rules of engagement. He admits to hammering at the aforementioned points several times, but says that redundancy helps bulldoze lessons home. What he does not see is the related problem of using more words than he needs to. For instance, Gilliam predicted that Times Square would exist targeted by a car bomber more than a year before that happened on May 1, 2010.
That was, in retrospect, an easy call for an FBI agent in New York doing threat assessments to make, just the bombing try surprised other people. Looking back at information technology, Gilliam writes that "what differentiated my threat assessments was that I had been paying close attention to the changing shift in tactics existence used by Islamic attackers overseas." A confident editor might take helped him encounter that a shift is a modify, and and so that sentence has 1 word too many. Extra words here and at that place pass unnoticed until readers start to see how many there are. Past and so, Gilliam sounds like an impatient NCO briefing a dim-witted superior.
Gilliam has difficulty with agreement between subjects and verbs. Following successful consulting piece of work for a hotel, he writes that "Not only had these iii simple changes made real proactive differences in rubber, information technology actually profited the visitor tremendously in the finish." His copy editor should take noticed that after referring to "changes" collectively, you must so say that "they" profited the company.
Did the editor take an off day? It may have been an off week. Gilliam doesn't mention that the inspiration for his title comes from Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, who famously divided society into sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs while summarizing his pioneering research into violence. That context would have been a dainty addition.
Gilliam writes that "anyone experienced in nefarious tactics" can see through "security theatrics" and "are in no style deterred by them." Fifty-fifty a newly-minted graduate of Editing 101 would fix that to read "anyone...is not deterred." Ten pages later, in an chestnut about a friend who read an early typhoon of the manuscript, Gilliam recalls that "Her first comments after reading the draft was that the writing was expert, only information technology seemed to exist a bit repetitive." Had the judgement said "comments...were," the pat on the back about writing would look less like a sumo wrestler at a gymnastics meet.
As much as I wanted to ignore impuissant syntax like "Envision yourself as the person faced with this awareness situation and decides to come up with the plans of action," I found that I could not. Discipline-verb agreement matters. Parallel structure matters. When those things are send-shape, idiosyncratic give-and-take pick doesn't brand me cringe. Just when they aren't, and I read a judgement like "Really," her friends laughed, "you accept a high-speed flashlight in your handbag?" (p. 176), I ask myself why nobody thought to wonder what a "loftier-speed" flashlight was, or right that malapropism then that people referred instead to a "high-powered" flashlight (which is probably what they said anyway).
In a slap at the premise of a acknowledged 1997 book by Gavin De Becker, Gilliam writes that fear is non a gift, information technology'south "an emotion that's sole purpose is to make you lot fight or flee in times of great stress and danger." That rejoinder suggests that Gilliam misunderstands De Becker, whose book praised intuition and treated fear as a symptom of that without denying its "fight or flight" purpose. An editor who'd read The Gift of Fear would have asked Gilliam to explain his scornful dismissal of De Becker. In this instance equally in other parts of the manuscript, negligent oversight robs Sheep No More of force it could have had, because Gilliam is every fleck the good he claims to be.
On the positive side of the ledger, off the hobby horse named "Grammar and Syntax," Sheep No More has solid advice about the safest manner for any traveling family to go through airport security gates. Gilliam too offers a rousing pep talk most the futility of "learned helplessness," and checklists to help civilians try on both aggressor and defender mindsets. He'south an interesting man and a competent fill-in for talk radio host Sean Hannity. Too bad he got sub-standard support from his publishing team. While Sheep No More taught me a few useful strategies for cocky-defense, it was more exasperating than informative, and made me want to edit Gilliam'due south side by side manuscript.
...more thanHe discusses how whatever defensive strategy can open up yous up to new threats. Notwithstanding, he fails to point out that being constantly on guard for threats is its ow
A friend and colleague, who has relatively unlike political views than I practice, recommended this to me. Firstly, the book does make some good points nearly areas of our life where we may overly rely on things "just existence fine" or on our institutions to protect us. Unfortunately, there were as well some rather large holes in the logic of this book.He discusses how whatever defensive strategy can open you up to new threats. Still, he fails to signal out that existence constantly on guard for threats is its ain threat. His own personal feel highlights these. He ended up on the wrong stop of a gun when he was mistaken for a home invader every bit a immature boy. Statistics evidence that guns are much more likely to end up hurting their owners than protecting them against a criminal or threat. At some point, profiling people based on religion or race may actually fuel the radicalization that is creating the threat in the outset place. Even the emotional stress of beingness scared all the time takes a physical toll, with increased cortisol suppressing our immune arrangement. At what point is the defensive strategy more unsafe than the potential threat? That is something important to keep in mind.
Additionally, he discusses how we tin can never completely eliminate the possibility of an attack. While this is true, at that place is no mode we can ever exist prepared for every possibility. (See The Black Swan for more than data on how bad we are at assessing possibilities) Still, does that hateful it'south non worthwhile to work with our institutions to change the probability or severity of different types of attacks?
Ane nit-picky thing that was just a niggling irritating is that he likewise doesn't understand the concept of learned helplessness. This comes from psychological studies where dogs were shocked over and over again and eventually larn to just tolerate existence harmed. Hither is generally talking about people who have been by and large condom and accept come to trust that safety, this is fundamentally unlike considering people with inexperience and trust yet have the power to become more wary if experience teaches them they should exist, those with learned helplessness have merely accepted that they volition be harmed and have stopped trying to protect themselves.
In any case, I'm glad I elected to read this volume if for no other reason to go a better idea of how someone with really different ideas thinks.
...moreParts one and 2 are about understanding how attackers think and then you tin be more aware. Parts 3 and 4 are about how to avoid attacks and defend yourself if necessary.
The author has serve
I didn't become much out of it, which was disappointing. It's mostly a call to exist more aware and prepared, with few concrete self-defense tips. A lot of the content is for regime officials, government, and leaders of organizations, not individuals or families. There are many detailed stories to illustrate concepts.Parts one and 2 are most agreement how attackers think so you can exist more enlightened. Parts three and 4 are about how to avoid attacks and defend yourself if necessary.
The author has served xx+ years equally a Navy SEAL, Federal Air Marshal, FBI special agent, and police officer. Unfortunately, he comes across as arrogant and somewhat abrasive.
Notes
What Is an Attack?
If someone is violently upset with you, walk or drive abroad, unless y'all're being physically assaulted, or someone is imminent danger. If yous hurt someone, even if you're in the correct, you face years of legal costs and untold stress.
Charting Target Package Data
Write the sectors of your family life (home, piece of work, school, etc.). For each sector, write critical assets, areas, times.
• Disquisitional assets: facilities, systems, equipment that could be targeted
• Critical areas: areas more likely to exist targeted
• Critical times: times when a critical area is nether college threat
Escape
Before attending a busy event, consider whether it could exist a terrorist target, and either don't attend, or attend simply stay in areas more defended from a potential attack.
Evade
Few materials will stop bullets; don't count on average doors, walls, piece of furniture to do it.
Information technology's better to escape attackers than to hibernate from them.
Know escape routes whenever you enter a building or area.
Fearfulness Is Not A Gift
To increase chances of surviving a mass killing, run or fight; don't hibernate or lie down.
I Last Case Report
US State Section website warns about dangers when traveling to other countries.
Attack and defend is the most important lesson of this book and as a prior Military machine Policeman, I take gained better insight to my daily routine, besides as my hereafter travel plans. Well written and very easy to implement the recommendations and strategies by the author. The case studies are intrinsic to the bailiwick. Everyone should read this volume and change their behavior for everyone's benefit.
Increased my situational awareness to a college level!Attack and defend is the most important lesson of this book and as a prior Armed services Policeman, I have gained better insight to my daily routine, as well every bit my future travel plans. Well written and very easy to implement the recommendations and strategies by the author. The example studies are intrinsic to the discipline. Everyone should read this book and alter their behavior for anybody'south do good.
...moreThe writing was okay, and many of his personal stories and some of the case stories weren't relevant to his points. Despite that, I would recommend the volume.
A well thought out and presented argument for becoming more aware of our environs. What if information technology changed our state? Well worth your consideration.
Be aware, learn your weaknesses, square up those, help others. Great read and very recommended yo others to read and exist aware
News & Interviews
Welcome dorsum. Only a moment while nosotros sign you lot in to your Goodreads account.
Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36146389-sheep-no-more
0 Response to "Barnes and Noble Sheep No More the Art of Awareness and Attack Survival"
Post a Comment